The Musée
du Louvre, Paris's version, Virgin of the Rocks by Leonardo da Vinci, 1483–1490;
The
National Gallery, London's version of Leonardo’s Virgin of the Rocks, circa 1508
(right)
Leonardo Da Vinci, pages 196-226
Virgin of the Rocks, exists
in two versions, when viewed they are similar but not identical. The one that is in the Louvre, Paris is pure
Leonardo, while the version in the National Gallery at London was painted much
later by Leonardo and his Milan studio assistant, Ambrogio de Predis. Why two versions?
A theory and recorded documentation shows that in 1483, while
living in Milan, Leonardo was commissioned by the Confraternity of the
Immaculate Conception to paint a three-panel altarpiece for the San Francesco
Grande, the biggest church in Milan.
Strangely, Leonardo deviated from the church specifications in size and
created a one-panel painting absent of the requested figures and symbols. It was believed that Leonardo began painting
the Virgin of the Rocks while he
lived in Florence that is why it lacked the details of the contract. When Leonardo asked for a higher payment for
the painting, the Confraternity barely came close to his request. Thus, the painting was taken back and sold to
Ludovico, Duke of Milan, who sent the painting as a wedding present to the Emperor
Maximillian in Germany. Over time the
painting eventually ended up in the Louvre after 1528.
This theory explains why the second, Virgin on the Rocks, the London version, was made as a substitute
for the Confraternity and why the differences in between the two paintings in
additional or absence of original detail and chiaroscuro effects.
Leonardo Ornithopter |
While Leonardo was working on the Virgin of the Rocks (which he considered
the Madonna female personification of nature, and the mistress of all masters),
Milan was in the midst of the three-year epidemic bubonic plague. As a way to escape the misfortunes and tragedy
of the time, Leonardo would make sketches, drawings and notes about building
proficient cities and churches; military machinery (as he secretly wanted to be
a military engineer); flying machines, such as the ornithopter (helicopter) and
cogs and wheels to raise water and power hydraulic machinery. Leonardo believed that there was a harmonious
balance in architecture, machinery and, especially, nature as well as in the
body. Leonardo became known for his
profound observations to penetrate deeper into the nature of nature or universal
law.
Additionally, the notebooks contained puns, word-games,
cryptograms, and riddling prophesies which lingered in the mind after they were
explained. Moreover, Leonardo wrote over
thirty fables about his compassionate view of nature, as he believed that
nature had a soul, an existence of spirit, and oftentimes, in social circles or
at court, he told his fables, prophecies, and puns.
In conclusion, not only was Leonardo a painter with an
exquisite style of making the religious beautiful into miraculous, he was a man
ahead of his time and had an innate curiosity in how things worked in nature as
well as how to improve the lifestyle and existence of man.
This seems like a very plausible explanation for the differences in the two Virgin of the Rocks. A bold move on Leonardo's part to sell it for a better price to a different customer.
ReplyDeleteIt seems that Leonardo had an appreciation for nature, that we so often forget to observe today. Reading all this makes me want to go outside and just be as curious. Madonna of the Rocks exemplifies his appreciation of nature fully in the way careful consideration is payed to the plants and the background is just as beautiful and alluring as it is foreboding and mysterious. To me, the background seems to represent the great unknown. Leonardo must've been aware of how much he and everybody else didn't know about the inner-workings of nature. Perhaps it gave him all the more motivation to keep exploring.
ReplyDeleteGood looking blog and comments are convincing and probably could be applied to all of Leonardo's works
ReplyDeleteI think it's interesting that Leonardo had all this serious art work and inventions and then at the same time wrote stories about his discoveries in nature and so on. When I think of Leonardo Da Vinci I don't think of a comedic man. Maybe my idea of him is all wrong, or maybe those stories weren't funny or in an entertaining manner at all.
ReplyDelete